35 Figures on the Decline of Relationships and the Rise of Technology

Less time together, less sex, and what arrived in the same years.

Started
Oct 2026
Finished
Nov 2026
Status
โ—Complete
Authors
Uncorrelated
AI Authors
Opus 5.5Fable 5.2
AI Tokens
1.2B tokens
Supplementary

Technology is competing for our attention, and it is winning.

Attention is also zero-sum. There is only so much time to give in a day.

This means, simply, that friends and family once took up more of our time and are now losing a battle against technology. Each minute spent on the TV, then the internet, then smartphones and then social media takes away from the time we'd spend with others.

I believe that capturing our attention is a data problem. As I showed in my previous post, the progress of a technology is proportional to the log of the information put into it. This is true not just in machine learning and AI, but across dozens of industries.

Over the past decade, the volume of data tech companies receive has been increasing exponentially. Data is their priority: if they can improve their algorithms to capture your attention, they can sell more of it. As a result, the algorithms have improved incrementally and continuously. We now spend more time than ever on tech.

At the same time, we are on the eve of the singularity. Superintelligence is near. It has the ability to accelerate technology enormously, decades in years. During this period, if humanity survives, I expect entertainment will evolve commensurately.

Hyperentertainment will emerge: algorithms exquisitely and superintelligently designed to satiate our senses. Since our attention is finite, I expect human relationships will largely begin to cease.

I've had AI scrape, collect and plot the following data, which I believe supports this thesis in aggregate.

Thank you for your attention.

People spend less time together

1. Americans aged 15โ€“24 spent 150 minutes a day with friends in 2003โ€“05 and 52 in 2023โ€“25. From the American Time Use Survey, which asks people to account for every minute of one day [our analysis].

Friend time, 15-24

2. The same survey by age. Every age group lost time with friends, and teenagers lost the most [our analysis].

Friend time by age

3. US diaries back to 1965: time with friends, relatives and neighbours on the left, time alone on the right. Among 18โ€“24-year-olds, time alone climbs after 2012 (our analysis of Fisher et al., 2018).

Who people were with since 1965

4. Socialising as a main activity, and television, over the same sixty years. Taking 19โ€“64-year-olds together, socialising fell from 66 minutes a day in 1965โ€“66 to 41 in 2022โ€“24, about 5 minutes a decade (our analysis of Fisher et al., 2018).

Socialising and TV since 1965

5. US high-school seniors, boys and girls, 1976โ€“2024: going out, dating, seeing friends and going to parties. Across both, the share going out three or more evenings a week was 53% in 1976, 45% in 2012 and 27% in 2024, the last on a web survey not strictly comparable with the paper years (our analysis of Miech et al., 2025).

US seniors' social life

6. The same question for 8th, 10th and 12th graders. All three grades turn down together around 2009โ€“10 (our analysis of Miech et al., 2025; Miech et al., 2025).

Going out by grade

7. Europe: the share who get together with friends every day, by age, in 2006, 2015 and 2022. Among 16โ€“24-year-olds it went from 52.5% to 35.2% (our analysis of EU-SILC; totals within a point of OECD, 2025).

Europe by age

8. A second European survey, with the same question in eleven rounds from 2002 to 2023: meeting friends, relatives or colleagues at least weekly, by age (our analysis of ERIC), 2025).

European Social Survey

9. Canada, 1986โ€“2022: the share of people who spent any time with friends on the day they kept a diary, and the hours they spent (Canada, 2025).

Canada

10. Japan: minutes of social life by age, 1976โ€“2021, beside television and, for teenagers, media use to 2025 [our analysis of the Survey on Time Use and Leisure Activities and the MIC media diary].

Japan

11. The longest series we could find outside the US. Norwegian 16โ€“24-year-olds' social time peaked at 147 minutes a day in 1980 and was 61 in 2022 [our analysis of national statistics offices, HBSC, EU-SILC and HETUS].

Longest series

12. Every country and indicator we could assess, coloured by direction. Blue is a fall [our analysis].

Landscape

13. The UK's licensed clubs, which include nightclubs, fell from 10,025 in 2010 to 6,335 in 2026 (our analysis of Statistics, 2026).

UK venues

They have less sex

14. US high-school students who have ever had sex: 54% in 1991, 32% in 2023 [our analysis of the CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey].

US high-school students

15. Americans aged 18โ€“29 reporting no sex in the past year: 13% in 2000โ€“08, 22% in 2021โ€“24 [our analysis of the General Social Survey].

No sex in the past year

16. The same measure for ages 22โ€“34 in a larger survey, the National Survey of Family Growth, with the 2022โ€“23 wave split by how people were interviewed [our analysis].

NSFG sexlessness

17. Never had sex, ages 22โ€“34. On the survey's long-running definition, and in face-to-face interviews only, it went from about 7% in 2017โ€“19 to about 12% in 2022โ€“23 [our analysis of the NSFG].

Never had sex

18. Number of partners in the past year, ages 22โ€“34. More people have none and fewer have exactly one [our analysis of the NSFG].

Number of partners

19. France, 1992โ€“2023: fewer adults had sex in the past year while lifetime partner counts rose (redrawn from ANRS-MIE, 2024).

France

20. How US heterosexual couples met. Of those who met in 1995, 2% met online and 33% through friends; of those who met in 2017, 39% and 20% (redrawn from Rosenfeld et al., 2019).

How couples meet

21. The companies that own the dating apps. Match Group's share price is down 74% from its 2021 peak [Yahoo Finance daily closes; our analysis].

Dating app stocks

Each new screen arrived faster

22. A century of new media in US homes: radio, television, colour, cable, the internet, the mobile phone, social media, the smartphone (Census, 1975; Advertising, 2011; Pew Research Center; Our World in Data).

Adoption curves

23. Television. The average US TV household had its set on for 4 hours 35 minutes a day in 1950 and 8 hours 21 minutes in 2009. In a 1965 diary study across twelve countries, people who owned a set watched about an hour and a quarter more a day than people who didn't, and spent 14 fewer minutes with other people (Advertising, 2011; Robinson & Martin, 2009; our analysis).

The television era

24. A Canadian town, called Notel by the researchers, got television reception in 1973. Its community life fell towards the level of two towns that already had it (redrawn from Williams, 1979).

Notel

25. Top: when each technology reached young people. Bottom: their in-person socialising. 52% of US 18โ€“29-year-olds owned a smartphone in spring 2011 and 92% by late 2016 (Smith, 2011; Center, 2017; our analysis).

Adoption and youth socialising

26. Every survey we could find that asks young people how long, or how often, they are online, 1996โ€“2025 [our analysis; sources in the figure].

Digital time

27. Time measured by meters and company logs instead of surveys. On Nielsen's meters, US 18โ€“24-year-olds' television fell from 193 to 109 minutes a day between 2012 and 2017, and their smartphone time rose from 61 minutes in late 2013 to 174, partly through changes in how Nielsen counted it (Company, 2012; Company, 2014; Company, 2017; company filings).

Measured engagement

28. What changed is the company. Screen time with friends present fell from 27 to 8 minutes a day, screen time alone rose from 72 to 118, and time at home rose from 327 to 403 [our analysis of the American Time Use Survey, ages 15โ€“24, 2003โ€“05 to 2023โ€“25].

Solitary screens

The feed is built to hold attention

29. What a user is worth. Meta shows each user about 2.3 times as many ads as it did in 2016 (our analysis of Meta Platforms, 2026).

Meta revenue and ads per user

30. In 2020, Meta let researchers switch randomly chosen US users to a newest-first feed for three months. They spent less time on Facebook and Instagram, and the Instagram users among them spent more time on TikTok and YouTube on their phones (redrawn from Guess et al., 2023).

Ranked and newest-first feeds

31. People paid to leave Facebook for four weeks got back an hour a day. Television alone and other solitary activities rose at least as much as time with friends and family (redrawn from Allcott et al., 2020).

Facebook deactivation

32. How happy Americans say they feel during each activity. Socialising averages 5.0 out of 6, television 4.3 and leisure on a computer 4.0 (our analysis of Statistics, 2022).

Happiness by activity

33. A similar question asked in the moment, by phone, 1.3 million times in the UK (redrawn from Bryson & MacKerron, 2017).

Mappiness

34. US college students needed $55 to give up TikTok for four weeks while everyone else stayed on. 60% of them would pay to have every participating student at their university, themselves included, taken off it (redrawn from Bursztyn et al., 2025).

Product market trap

35. The next screen. 72% of US teenagers have used an AI companion and 52% use one regularly (redrawn from Robb & Mann, 2025).

AI companions

References

Fisher, K., Gershuny, J., Flood, S. M., et al. (2018). American Heritage Time Use Study Extract Builder: Version 1.2. doi:10.18128/D061.V1.2 โ†ฉยนโ†ฉยฒ [supp]
Miech, R. A., Johnston, L. D., Patrick, M. E., et al. (2025). Monitoring the Future: A Continuing Study of American Youth (12th-Grade Survey), 1976--2024. doi:10.3886/ICPSR39444.v2 โ†ฉยนโ†ฉยฒ [supp]
Miech, R. A., Johnston, L. D., Patrick, M. E., et al. (2025). Monitoring the Future: A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th- and 10th-Grade Surveys), 1991--2024. doi:10.3886/ICPSR39445.v2 โ†ฉ [supp]
OECD (2025). Social Connections and Loneliness in {OECD} Countries. doi:10.1787/6df2d6a0-en โ†ฉ [supp]
European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC) (2025). {ESS} Rounds 1--11 integrated data files (editions 6.7, 3.6, 3.7, 4.6, 3.6, 2.7, 2.3, 2.3, 3.3, 3.3, 4.2). โ†ฉ [supp]
Statistics Canada (2025). Time pressure and time spent with friends over the last 30 years. โ†ฉ [supp]
Office for National Statistics (2026). {UK} Business Counts -- local units by industry ({SIC} 2007 subclasses 56.30/1 and 56.30/2), 2010--2026. https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/datasets/idbrlu โ†ฉ [supp]
Inserm -- ANRS-MIE (2024). Premiers r{\'e}sultats de l'enqu{\^e}te {CSF}-2023 (Contexte des sexualit{\'e}s en France). โ†ฉ [supp]
Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the {United States} displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1908630116 โ†ฉ [supp]
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975). Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Bicentennial Edition, Part 2. โ†ฉ [supp]
Television Bureau of Advertising (2011). {TV} Basics: A Report on the Growth and Scope of Television. https://web.archive.org/web/20110408223709/http://www.tvb.org/media/file/TV_Basics.pdf โ†ฉยนโ†ฉยฒ [supp]
Robinson, J. P., Martin, S. (2009). Of Time and Television. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. doi:10.1177/0002716209339275 โ†ฉ [supp]
Williams, T. M. (1979). The Impact of Television: A Natural Experiment Involving Three Communities. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED172293 โ†ฉ [supp]
Smith, A. (2011). Smartphone Adoption and Usage. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/07/11/overview-of-smartphone-adoption/ โ†ฉ [supp]
Pew Research Center (2017). Mobile Fact Sheet. https://web.archive.org/web/20170201084059/http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/ โ†ฉ [supp]
The Nielsen Company (2012). The Cross-Platform Report, Quarter 2, 2012. https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/Nielsen-Cross-Platform-Report-Q2-2012-final.pdf โ†ฉ [supp]
The Nielsen Company (2014). An Era of Growth: The Cross-Platform Report, {Q4} 2013. โ†ฉ [supp]
The Nielsen Company (2017). The Nielsen Total Audience Report: Q2 2017. https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/total-audience-report-q2-2017.pdf โ†ฉ [supp]
Meta Platforms, I. (2026). Annual Reports on Form 10-K, fiscal years 2016--2025: ad impressions and average price per ad. โ†ฉ [supp]
Guess, A. M., Malhotra, N., Pan, J., et al. (2023). How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?. Science. doi:10.1126/science.abp9364 โ†ฉ [supp]
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., et al. (2020). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. American Economic Review. doi:10.1257/aer.20190658 โ†ฉ [supp]
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022). American Time Use Survey Well-Being Module, 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2021 microdata files. https://www.bls.gov/tus/data/wbdatafiles_1013.htm โ†ฉ [supp]
Bryson, A., MacKerron, G. (2017). Are You Happy While You Work?. The Economic Journal. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12269 โ†ฉ [supp]
Bursztyn, L., Handel, B., Jim{\'e}nez-Dur{\'a}n, R., et al. (2025). When Product Markets Become Collective Traps: The Case of Social Media. American Economic Review. doi:10.1257/aer.20231468 โ†ฉ [supp]
Robb, M. B., Mann, S. (2025). Talk, Trust, and Trade-Offs: How and Why Teens Use {AI} Companions. doi:10.65077/wiil1800 โ†ฉ [supp]